Foreign Policy and International Topics of Interest for Think Tanks and Radio Listeners

Suggest Article   Article comments   Print Article Share this article on facebook Share this text on Twitter Share this text on Google+ Share this text on Linkedin Share this text on StumbleUpon Share this text on delicious Share this text on Digg Share this text on Reddit Share this text on Pinterest
informed creator Lance Winslow
Greetings all people on this 18th day of October 2012, I truly hope your day goes better than folks that live in Syria the place the refugee border camps are filling up and neighboring international locations can not fairly come up with the money for to take anymore, as 36,000 men and women have already died in that civil conflict according to UN figures, which i guess one would say are unreliable, however my sources do tell me the numbers could be very high, possibly even nearly that 36K number. So, it is a tragedy anyway you look at it.

Okay so, let's get right into modern talk exhibit and well you realize the format; "I speak you pay attention, you listen, then we open up the telephone strains on your questions and comments, and feel-free considering that you don't have to agree, you simply have to have an intellectual counter argument, or a good comment, and we are all good to go, if now not, as  - click on goes your dial tone - so fair warning."

considering that the up-coming ultimate presidential debate will likely be exceptionally on foreign policy, we can begin there, as these last few debates, if that you could name them that, good, they obviously are not helping alongside our countrywide communicate with sound bites of two-minutes at a time and with at the least enough interruptions to run you out of toes and fingers to rely with. Rings a bell in my memory of a fact tv sequence where 2-humans are left on the island and they are arguing to stay - good, let's get into it now - for the reason that we're once again on the high of the hour and it is time to play - game on!

Now then, in line with the Futurist magazine, November-December trouble 2012, there was once an article in Future Scope in their September-October predicament on web page 4 discussing the challenges with the beef industry. You see, droughts in the us have hurt the meat industry anything horrible, and in step with the article; "China's developing appetite for Meat Will pressure international give," these challenges could be exacerbated. We already comprehend this is something we now have been informed from studying the news and figuring out the serious nature of the drought this year. Of path, we all know one of the vital pacing and moaning has been as a result of the Farm bill (packed with pork for meals stamps I would add - which is company welfare plus a social application) which Congress is attempting to get handed, and the lobbyists such as the significant corporate farms.

Nonetheless, it's a serious and real drawback, even on the Mississippi River they famous that some of the barges were parked, and there used to be a site visitors jam of some 100 barges as they had to navigate the center of the river because of the low volume, and there used to be no two-approach traffic. This does not bode good for US farm exports, or manufacturing exports which use that waterway to get to the Gulf of Mexico, the port in New Orleans.

We also be aware of that many of the cattle ranchers took their cattle to slaughter early considering the fact that they could not manage to pay for to feed due to the drought problems, and cattle drink tons of water as well. This intended be costs were at an all-time low for an awfully brief period of time, and now the demand has far outpaced the supply and the costs are will probably be a long way too exceptional.

Incidentally, in Tennessee the favourite restaurant chain "backyard Burgers" filed bankruptcy, and there will probably be extra, the fee of beef was a component together with new laws and wellness care costs - aka Obama Care.

Saudi Arabia is now making an attempt to get into the beef and dairy enterprise, despite the fact that there is very little water and they need to import their feed, however I suppose they are able to trade for oil, plenty of that stuff, plus new fracking methods enable for extra - so height oil goes to have to take a hike for a even as, although that day too is coming to a Kingdom close you when you live in the core East.

Nonetheless, what in regards to the perpetual drought problem in Saudi Arabia, frequently a wilderness in lots of elements? Good, sure it is, however they are utilizing desalination systems, and making an attempt their hand at constructing detailed airflow condensers to preserve the cattle cool. Might this be a new enterprise for them, they suppose so. To not mention the actual fact that there's a big market and demand for meat around the globe. China for instance, they may be eating more and more red meat at the moment.

In the meantime, in step with the Wall avenue Journal cattle ranchers are working to make use of predetermined-intercourse synthetic insemination methods now, why you ask, to provide extra feminine cows. This will permit them to develop their herds extra swiftly when the water comes again, the feed prices come down, and things return to usual - query is; what is the new typical going to be? Prior to now it can be taken years to rebuild the herds after big scale droughts, and that doesn't bode so well for our first world nation which eats quite a bit of of meat. It appears as though free-market capitalism in the international market is working round these issues, however the pork industry is infrequently out of the woods but.

And speaking of the worldwide marketplace, we are not the only nation anymore looking for an intelligent group of workers and recruiting from all over the planet. Today we're competing with Europe, China, Brazil, India, the center East, Japan, Australia, Canada and many other countries some first world, some rising. My question is; are we burning are competencies here at home? That's to claim; are we enjoying an excessive amount of patty-cake in our faculties, utilizing an excessive amount of political correctness, and creating too many socialist trends to provide the rough work ethic wanted for math and science at the higher divisions?

Do we've adequate Tiger mothers and mother and father that price schooling to get this achieved? Speakme of which in notice magazine in the October 2012 trouble there used to be an awfully interesting article by means of Derek Lowe titled; "The Contrarian View - the united states would not Have a Scientist shortage," and the writer mentioned; "we need to worry in regards to the best, not the quantity of US scientists." indeed, I feel I concur with this because it has also been noted that even as India and China are graduating extra engineers and scientists, and at the moment are surpassing the us within the quantity of study papers produced and patents filed, so much of the fine is less than par, and their study papers will not be publishable in the higher finish scientific journals.

To not mention they are mainly plagued with plagiarism, errors, mistakes, and false data by means of dishonest on the exams and outcome inside their scientific stories. Interestingly enough doesn't this get back to the 80/20 rule? The place 80% of the persons are taking on area and only 20% of the people are relatively doing some thing? And relatively is not there an eighty/20 rule on top of that the place eighty% of the rest 20%, equaling four% is particularly the place it's at? And if most effective four% of the scientists are quite making large headway, why do we each person else, why no longer focal point on the excellent and brightest?

Basically sending folks to school so they can make more money or get higher jobs, or become scientist may not be central until they can pull their weight, make new discoveries, and hence we get a return on investment for all these study greenbacks are executive is pumping into the sciences. Besides that have you ever checked out tuition lessons charges rising at 5% to 7% once a year, would not you adore that stage of return on your investment portfolio due to the fact that the turn of the century? And what about 9.6% and rising scholar loan default charges? We have got to rethink all this, well, your thoughts possibly intriguing after we open up the call traces.

In foreign Affairs magazine September-October 2012 dilemma there used to be an interesting article through Andrew J Nathan and Andrew Scobel titled "How China Sees america" the place they state that China sees the U.S. As aggressive and opposed, and to that I say; "what a twist of fate, does any individual have a reflect they may be able to borrow, or did they already steal that intellectual property and design to make these mirrors to promote to Wal-Mart to sell right here?" What precipitated that article on, why did the author write it you ask?

Good, I believe it was the comments by Mitt Romney on the campaign path, and part of his five-point financial plan the place he said he would crack down on China as a currency manipulator, along with their intellectual property theft, cyber-assaults and information stealing, along with their possess aggressive movements of their surrounding territorial waters which might be additionally claimed via international locations like Taiwan, Japan, Philippines, South Korea, and Vietnam. All of which have had words, and conflicts on the ocean, in many instances over mere shoals, protruding rocks, and tiny islands.

Now China has an aircraft carrier in its Communist purple military's Navy and so one might say that their navy is now not just about protecting the mainland, but projecting drive, in the end isn't that what aircraft carriers are for? This new aircraft carrier of theirs, albeit an historical refurbished one which must had been bought for scrap or became an leisure park just like the now noted Noah's Ark reproduction in Hong Kong, will soon start sea trials and plane operations.

Might be The RAND enterprise made a terrible tactical error, albeit probably politically right on the time once they wrote the paper about "China's worldwide habits" where the paper insisted that China used to be consistent and nonaggressive, and yes, even the CFR Council on foreign members of the family, which I've commonly referred to as the Council on overseas Appeasement is still out at present promoting China as benevolent. Still, it wasn't more than a year later after that Rand research record when all this different stuff began, along with their new navy bases and port operations which can be traditionally known as the "string of pearls" which maintain developing in size and numbers all of the way to Pakistan which signed over a deep sea port of theirs on the Arabian Sea.

As a result might be Mitt Romney is proper, and maybe the authors of this overseas Affairs magazine should be more concerned with what's going on, as an alternative than what both of our nation's thinks concerning the other, seeing that most likely they do not care, they usually see exchange alongside the equal line graph as battle, simplest to a lesser degree, they've even recounted so. Further, it can be tough to say why individuals in the U.S. Trust any product coming from China after the toxic pet food, the chemicals within the drywall, the lead in the toy paint, or the protein within the fish feed and livestock feed the place these products are then processed and despatched to the us consumer. Mitt Romney is correct and China wishes to play fair, why is that now not the order of the day within the Obama Administration - I mean last time he went to discuss with they dressed him up in a Mao Costume for the stage, remember?

Next, there was once one other interesting article in that international Affairs challenge, it used to be titled "the us the Undertaxed - US Fiscal policy and standpoint," by way of Andrea Louise Campbell and in her article she had a chart showing which countries had been taxed essentially the most, and which have been taxed the least. The socialist European countries were taxed the perfect starting with Denmark and Sweden at forty eight%. The united states, Chile and Mexico had been at the backside at 24.1, 18.Four, and 17.4 respectively. Individually, i do not believe it is proper to compare the USA to a socialist nation, and that i think with our self-reliant upbringing, and our powerful traditions we don't need to go in that direction, nor would we quite enjoy a enormous centralized huge govt Nanny State.

You see, these different countries have very small populations, and previously very homogeneous possibly not as so much today, however on the other hand their economies aren't doing all that high-quality now are they? The USA is a nation of immigrants, and persons have come right here from all over the place the world, we've many cultures mixing in our society, and giant populations.

Most of these socialist Nordic international locations have very small populations, and we've got many cities with populations way over that, to not point out a few of our largest states. We should not examine a country with a populace of four to 12 million and assume those systems will work with the us with states like California and just Southern California by myself will quickly be coming near 20 million.

As far as i'm worried it can be unfortunate that overseas Affairs journal has such jaded articles toward the socialist point of view. Yes, it's a tutorial mental point of view, however that doesn't make it correct, that simply proves that our academia has additionally been infiltrated with these poorly concept out economics theories, ones which do not now not work, and for illustration we are able to look at Argentina, Venezuela, Greece, Spain, Italy, ireland, and of path Portugal - and recognize i am best naming a few.

One of the crucial equal persons don't believe in free-market capitalism or capitalism at all. Actually in that same foreign Affairs magazine there used to be an editorial suggesting that constructive GDP growth might no longer be excellent at all; "Is growth excellent - resources, progress and the way forward for the Planet," by Francis Beinecke, who right away advised; "environmentalists don't oppose growth," nevertheless, right here in the USA they certainly do. And if a few of these academics would get out of their lecturing halls and run a real trade in the real world they could see it's really evident that environmentalists do oppose development, on each nook in each metropolis and town in the united states or the world for that topic.

Simply go try to put in a new restaurant, carwash, retail retailer, apartment problematic, or God forbid some industrial industry? You are going to be tied up in Environmental have an effect on reviews (EIRs) unless you both run out of money suffering legal professionals, or the bank which used to be going to fund the challenge will get taken over by using the FDIC, got to like Dodd Frank and "too small to outlive" theory. You might think i'm simply kidding, but i'm now not go attempt to run a business in this nation and spot what you can be up against. Many of our ideas and laws have the whole lot to do with environmentalism, socialism, and that agenda towards free-market capitalists.

Still, with regards to austerity it does not appear that the socialists need to reduce and live within their manner. Alternatively they might just like to tax all people in "unless they run out of other men and women's cash to spend," which of course is a noted quote I borrowed from Margaret Thatcher. In that equal limitation of international Affairs magazine, there was an editorial titled "Stimulus or Reform - Charting a course out of Recession - No Time for Austerity," by means of Mezie D. Chin.

Of course, although Barack Obama had spent over $5 trillion over the federal executive's tax revenues over the final 4 years it used to be instructed within the American Prospect magazine in September-October 2012 that the Obama administration must have used more stimulus money however chickened out. Can you imagine what the federal finances deficit could be if we had been allowed to spend much more? The fact is that they wasted the cash - funding big substitute energy projects that occurred to be run in 50% of the cases by way of their crony capitalist acquaintances and campaign contributors, as Mitt Romney noted within the debate and the "truth-checkers" didn't venture - why? It can be the truth.

The way in which I see it, that is in actual fact making use of the taxpayers money for paying again there political contributors to make sure that these same crusade donors would proceed to offer them money of their subsequent circular for re-election in 2012, which is where we're right now. If you happen to disagree, all you need to do is appear on the crusade donation records, and all of the names of the executives, and investors behind these initiatives. It is all there in black and white - or call in with proof otherwise after we open the telephone strains.

Still, the socialist say we have got to give more money to the bad, but now we are giving money to the center class, or what used to be within the middle category, as we have now 47 billion men and women on meals stamps now. Meanwhile the equal men and women want the us taxpayer to provide more cash in overseas aid to aid in the battle on poverty.

Ok, certain let's speak about poverty for a second, in view that I brought it up. You see, there was once an exciting article titled "the other struggle On Poverty" via Leon R Kass in global Affairs magazine, number 12 - summer season 2012. Now then, I have got to ask, having written a few e-books on one of the crucial poorest individuals within the very poorest nations both living in rule negative areas or in urban slums that more commonly the conflict on poverty factors extra poverty, what's taking place on this regard. Poverty is increasing in the U.S. Don't forget?

Certainly, this mustn't shock us on account that the battle on terrorism appears to have brought on a better capability of the terrorists to recruit extra, as a result there's extra terrorism. And the battle on medicinal drugs appears to have accelerated the cost of medications, crime, and violence. There are more people on medications, and extra money go with the flow considering the fact that of it. On the subject of our overseas policy - good, possibly the entire proposal of "successful their hearts and minds" is not working, and that familiarity is in simple terms bringing more contempt, extra, it will have to be famous that the legislation of unintended consequences appears to are living inside these socialist approaches, as if it is a melanoma on humanity as we train more persons to take a fish as an alternative than to learn  fish and remain self-reliant, now every person is becoming weak, and they cannot stop trying more - so which main issue have they solved as of late - none, most likely none making use of those silly socialist procedures - i would say, maybe you might opine? What say you, my devoted listener and article reader?

Extra, apparently we are stifling free company, and free-market capitalism at every flip by way of overregulation. We're riding corporations far from our shores because of these accelerated ideas and regulations, union needs, and over lawyering. It's getting very difficult to build anything in this nation (even hamburgers, as I acknowledged) and still compete on the worldwide market, now we have improved our wholesale costs because of legislation and taxes on almost everything from the gasoline that our firms use in supply to the uncooked materials they have got to make the fundamental merchandise.

In countrywide Affairs journal, summer season 2012 there used to be an editorial through Christopher DeMuth titled; "The Regulatory State," where he readily acknowledged a identified truism to any individual within the DC Metro area; "Washington is on a regulatory progress spurt. Hundreds of thousands of rulemaking lawsuits underway or pending," and he cited; Dodd Frank, Obama Care, the EPA, and the FCC. I ask what concerning the FAA, FTC, DHS, and FDA just to call a number of more?

Nonetheless, another author of an essay within the American Prospect magazine, September-October 2012 drawback wrote an editorial titled; "What If Labor Dies, What's subsequent? With the aid of Harold Meyerson. Well i'll tell you what would happen, it could be special on account that the American taxpayer would no longer be placed on the hook to bail out the underfunded pensions, the American purchaser would now not have to pay an excessive amount of for all of the merchandise they buy, and we should not have some individuals getting Cadillac healthcare advantages riding up the price of healthcare for every body else which has extended 8% per 12 months. We do not have as many protests, work slowdowns, persons looking to sneak out early and get incapacity advantages. And we would not have significant balloting blocs lobbying politicians and electing extra socialist pondering leaders into our legislator or government branch in our states or in our federal govt. It clearly could be exceptional for our country.

Now then, I ask the place is all this socialist variety considering coming from anyway. Well, much of it's coming from the intellectual elite of academia. Of path i do not see them as anymore mental as someone else and recall I run a believe tank so i am not just spouting hyperbole here, as a subject truth I see that they're missing some area on their resume in view that they've by no means run a trade of their life, so they don't comprehend economics or how the sector works. Some of them certainly expect that government is the creator of jobs and the economy. It is now not, regardless of what our President has stated previously in speeches that inadvertently hurt my emotions and the sentiments of small industry entrepreneurs around this nice nation.

It can be not presupposed to be that way, especially in the united states the place we have a private central financial institution. Of course, beneath danger from the legislature and government branch, they seem to be bending too much to political strain, and so they maintain loaning the federal executive cash that our govt can not pay back with its present monetary systems, or will not pay back one day, which means they will default.

Just the other day, I was at one of the colossal box bookstores sitting in the espresso retailer and that i talked to a quality woman who was getting her teacher credentials so she will be able to instruct on the institution level; history and anthropology. A part of her certificate required her to take a prerequisite classification on economics. She proposal that used to be unfair, she concept economics used to be too hard, and she or he used to be upset that she even had to gain knowledge of it. Nevertheless, in case you seem at history, quite a lot of socioeconomic strategies have both succeeded, or failed and caused entire civilizations to break down. And i am simply no longer talking about Amsterdam relocating ahead, or the challenges in Europe with the cloth enterprise produced in India, or the changes in alternate with the exceptional Silk Roads.

We will go all of the approach back to the coins that have been generally cut into portions considering that they have been traded via weight no longer always through what was on the coin, some of which they determined in Norway recently courting tremendously some distance again, greater than a thousand years. It seems unlucky that a historical past instructor on the college and institution level feels that learning economics is not an main foundational foundation for her experiences. But indeed, is not that relatively the difficulty were looking at here?

We've pupils graduating from excessive college who may just not ever go to school who can not balance a checkbook, who never took an economics category, but they still vote. If a flesh presser stands up the rostrum and says; "that you could get free stuff for the leisure of your life, and the government pays for it, simply vote for me," then they'll, and they have, and it can be still going on in this present election, and you consider persons would be aware of better after looking at the dismal fiscal efficiency and failure an fiscal recuperation from the Obama Administration. Am I showing my political colors here? Might be so, however should you hearken to this radio show lengthy or learn my articles sufficient you realize precisely what i am speakme about, but you might be one or the instructed ones, an instructed voter, what about all these other people? They are voting too you realize.

Personally, i have obvious the longer term, however Obama's vision of it would not exist in that future, it are not able to. Given that if the U.S. Of the united states is to have a future in any respect, it can't be a socialist one, or this whole thing is going to come back down like a crashing condo of playing cards being run over with the aid of a cement truck, laden with all that dead weight, particles, and debt. Good, i assume that's my opinion, and that i concept it was as an alternative high-quality when Mitt Romney mentioned on the finish of the 0.33 debate in the course of this political season; "The Obama Administration's policies have failed, that is the us of the us and we do not have got to reside like this," and then supplied up his 5-point plan one more time. I guess i am with him and those phrases, and as you already know we like to get just a little opinionated on this radio exhibit and with the articles I write.

So right here we are as soon as again on the finish of half-hour of me speakme, and also you listening, and now it can be your flip to hold forth i will now open the telephone strains, or in case you are reading the transcript online put up a comment or two, or shoot me an electronic mail message.

Don't forget the foundations; bring your intellect, engage in mental talk, and might be we can do higher than these tit-for-tat cat fights in these presidential election debates we have now been taking note of? That is the purpose here in these days. Indeed i am hoping you will please do not forget all this and think on it, and you could  dialing that cellphone now, or posting a remark below if you're reading this on-line.